The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

Table of Contents

Order Number	Y47874HDUEW
Type of Project	Essay/Research Paper
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS
Writing Style	APA/Harvard/MLA/CHICAGO
Citations	5
Page Count	3-15

Description/Paper Instructions

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

The lockdown

Alexander argues that the criminal justice impression created throughout popular culture is profoundly misleading “the modern-day equals of old films portraying the happy slaves.” Chapter Two deals with the war on drugs and anti-drug laws that have shaped the new American criminal justice system. So it would seem that many Americans do not recognize the U.S. Fourth Amendment. Currently, the Constitution says what the police need or what it wants.

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

This literature amendment provides that: in full, the right of the people to be protected from arbitrary searches and seizures in their individuals, homes, papers, and effects shall be breached, and no warrants were given, except with probable cause backed by oaths or assertion, except in particular specifying the place to be searched, and the person or items being to be searched.

Therefore, this supports the idea that most American people do not recognize the U.S Fourth Amendment.

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

However, most Americans tend to think that they understand the criminal justice system’s workings, based on T.V. programs featuring offenders and newspaper coverage. Alexander thus ventures into the war on drugs with daunting myths of significance. First of all, she claims that the conflict is not a war goal.

The narcotics war aimed solely at the “hazardous” substances; marijuana has focused 80% more drug convictions since 1980. In later chapters, Alexander shows how the drug war is aimed primarily at people of color (Alexander, 2020). Still, in Chapter Two, she is only concerned about how the fight will imprison such a significant proportion of the American population.

Therefore, Alexander tells in-depth how the legal system’s inside and outside have been confused, particularly after the war on drugs. This campaign has quadrupled the number of opioid users going to jail for forced minima or three-strike regulations.

For nonviolent, soft substance offenses such as pot possession, the bulk of people who serve time in prison are convicted. The law enforcement agencies are encouraged by federal sanctions and measures to expand prosecutions and confiscations. They were motivated by ethnic profiling, which might offer ‘that he had short hair,’ or ‘that he had long hair.’ When the U.S. Supreme Court is called to trial by the constitutionality of those practices, the courts are continuously ruling in favor of interpreting the law.

The CourtCourt continually denies any verification that many of the stops and frisks are just skin color.

This would prove Alexander’s claims in the Chapter where he suggests that the Drug War has empowered the police to work without moral “constraint.” The Supreme Court repeatedly held that the Constitution contained a “drug exception” to disqualify citizens from fundamental rights, from voting to employment to privacy.

That means that the drug war utterly contradicts America’s status as a democracy characterized by everyone’s freedoms and human liberties. According to Alexander, “nobody else can legally violate their rights under anti-drug policies, virtually everywhere for any reason.”

Nevertheless, the police had been banned from arresting and investigating individuals without permission in the past, which was considered a “fourth principle of the amendment” and reversed after the ‘stop and frisk’ was introduced in 1968.

Furthermore, this Chapter’s conviction is just the beginning of an imprisonment scourge on suspicion of organized crime. Many criminals convicted head to CourtCourt without legal counsel. They are under coercion from the government, even though they did not commit the crime, to plead guilty to a settlement.

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

To not assert guilty is to face being charged more seriously. The bulk of public defenders are overwhelmed.

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

They also persuade their customers to take the offer instead of running the risk of increasing jail sentences. But the research and evidence quoted in Kissing Frogs have shown that most people arrested and searched are “innocent of any crime.” intending to control anyone and check them for drugs using any excuse, which is most often racist. Many innocent citizens in this chain are harmed.

Alexander states that the War on Drugs was originally a legislative campaign reinvented by the Reagan Administration, and not even a law enforcement initiative. The federal government gave supporting legal enforcement measures to adapt its priorities to opioid offenses to get law enforcement on board. This is important as the study explores how a massive war on drugs could work and why it could succeed. It is important.

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

Moreover, courts were often lenient before mandatory minimum punishment rules if the offender was threatened with poverty, alcohol, or misuse problems. However, compulsory minimum sentences mean that judges scarcely participate and cannot exercise this leniency even though they wish.

In America, the duration of such terms is typically ten years. Even first-time criminals are often sentenced to life in jail, which is the case in the rest of the world, where opioid sentences are repeatedly measured over months. Alexander is a reminder of actual offenders with extraordinarily lengthy sentences for simple offenses that ruin their lives. She points out that the Supreme Court of Conservatives Anthony Kennedy, who was confirmed by Reagan, deemed compulsory and “unnecessary” minimum penalties.

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

Excellent	The essay demonstrates exemplary comprehension of the relevant content by thoroughly as well as correctly discussing the relevant information; identifying as well as explaining all of the 3 fundamental aspects; using correct terminology; describing the reasoning next to key points/claims; as well as substantiating points with several accurate as well as illuminating examples, as necessary or useful. There are no gaps in the necessary answer.
Good	Scholarly sources that are credible are employed to successfully support statements that are, as the most part, clear as well as fairly expressed. With just a few minor inaccuracies, APA 6th Edition is utilized. There are a few small typos in the references and/or citations. There is some reliance on dubious sources.
Satisfactory	Because of certain improper terminology and/or confusing wording, the work is frequently confused and difficult to understand; thoughts may be disjointed, meandering, and/or repetitious. a lack of structure; and/or grammatical, spelling, and punctuation mistakes.
Poor	The essay demonstrates a lack of understanding of the related documents by failing to address or improperly addressing the relevant; failing to identify or incorrectly trying to explain key concepts/ideas; ignoring as well as incorrectly attempting to explain key points/claims as well as the rationale behind them; and/or inaccurately or improperly using terminology.
No Response	Essay displays great writing abilities, such as a clear as well as thought-provoking thesis, suitable and effective organization, vibrant and persuasive supporting materials, good diction as well as sentence skills, and faultless or almost perfect mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. The essay flawlessly achieves the assignment’s objectives.
Quality of Response	Because of its intelligent growth and mature manner, this study merits attention. It provides a compelling analysis of or reaction to the text, expanding on that response using well-chosen examples and arguments. The sixth paper demonstrates that its author can typically use appropriate words, employ advanced phrases successfully, and adhere to written English rules.
Delivery Timeline	3 hours – 24 hours
Backlinks	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.contentexpertagencies.com/orders/ordernow

The Lockdown Revised Argumentative Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.