Develop an argument that compares two or more types of violence in a specific way with elder abuse, such as the root causes, the impact on victims, society’s perception of the crime, or our response to the crime. How are they similar or different.
Paper must be 5 pages, doubled spaced.
Must include the 4 articles listed below.
Begin with an introductory paragraph that includes a clear thesis statement.
Develop a well-designed, compelling argument throughout the paper. Each paragraph should relate back to the thesis statement.
Demonstrate critical analysis of the articles and topics.
Use proper grammar and spelling, as well as APA-style citations and references.
Conclude with at least one paragraph on implications for social work.
USE REFERENCES LISTED BELOW: You may use others as well, but the 4 below are REQUIRED.
Beaulaurier, R.L., Seff, L.R., Newman, F.L., & Dunlop, B. (2007). External barriers to help seeking for older women who experience intimate partner violence (Links to an external site.). Journal of Family Violence, 22, 747–755.
Burnes, D. R., Rizzo, V. M., & Courtney, E. (2014). Elder abuse and neglect risk alleviation in protective services (Links to an external site.). Journal of Interpersonal Violence,29(11), 2091–2113.
DeLiema, M., Gassoumis, Z. D., Homeier, D. C., & Wilber, K. H. (2012). Determining prevalence and correlates of elder abuse using promotores: Low-income immigrant Latinos report high rates of abuse and neglect (Links to an external site.). Journal of The American Geriatrics Society, 60(7), 1333–1339.
Donovan, K., & Regehr, C.. (2010). Elder abuse: Clinical, ethical, and legal considerations in social work practice (Links to an external site.). Clinical Social Work Journal, 38(2), 174-82.
Forms Of Elder Abuse Argument
|Excellent||The essay demonstrates exemplary comprehension of the relevant content by thoroughly as well as correctly discussing the relevant information; identifying as well as explaining all of the 3 fundamental aspects; using correct terminology; describing the reasoning next to key points/claims; as well as substantiating points with several accurate as well as illuminating examples, as necessary or useful. There are no gaps in the necessary answer.|
|Good||Scholarly sources that are credible are employed to successfully support statements that are, as the most part, clear as well as fairly expressed. With just a few minor inaccuracies, APA 6th Edition is utilized. There are a few small typos in the references and/or citations. There is some reliance on dubious sources.|
|Satisfactory||Because of certain improper terminology and/or confusing wording, the work is frequently confused and difficult to understand; thoughts may be disjointed, meandering, and/or repetitious. a lack of structure; and/or grammatical, spelling, and punctuation mistakes.|
|Poor||The essay demonstrates a lack of understanding of the related documents by failing to address or improperly addressing the relevant; failing to identify or incorrectly trying to explain key concepts/ideas; ignoring as well as incorrectly attempting to explain key points/claims as well as the rationale behind them; and/or inaccurately or improperly using terminology.|
|No Response||Essay displays great writing abilities, such as a clear as well as thought-provoking thesis, suitable and effective organization, vibrant and persuasive supporting materials, good diction as well as sentence skills, and faultless or almost perfect mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. The essay flawlessly achieves the assignment’s objectives.|
|Quality of Response||Because of its intelligent growth and mature manner, this study merits attention. It provides a compelling analysis of or reaction to the text, expanding on that response using well-chosen examples and arguments. The sixth paper demonstrates that its author can typically use appropriate words, employ advanced phrases successfully, and adhere to written English rules.|
|Delivery Timeline||3 hours – 24 hours|