All Animals Are Equal Discussion Paper
Order Number Y47874HDUEW Type of Project Essay/Research Paper Writer Level PHD/MASTERS Writing Style APA/Harvard/MLA/CHICAGO Citations 5 Page Count 3-15
All Animals Are Equal Discussion Paper
I have to responds to 2 discussions each discussion is a paragraph long or one page.
Considering this weeks reading titled “All animals are equal” by Peter Singer I would agree that the habitats for animal are equally important as
their lives. However, utilitarianism and humanism are human centered theories. According to both theories are based on fulfill their needs and
there is no moral obligation to the environment. Since we are the dominant species that seems like a lose lose situation for the environment and
non-human species throughout the world. I mean with out a natural habitat how can their non-human species thrive and provide to us the means
to survive. Both land ethics and levels of embeddness operate on the same principle as disproportionality. We as a people can use the land as we
see fit, but a level of respect must exist to function in harmony with nature. For example, let say some company wanted to build homes on top of
acres of wetland. Now for us what is the value for those acres because for me I could perceive this in a couple of ways. Our population is
continually growing, and new homes are essential to giving a family a place to call home. However, these wetlands serve as natures own little
personnel filter for our local bodies of water. When chemicals or any unnatural substance get into the wetland areas it prevents damage to plants,
humans, and animals alike. I mean non-point pollution has been a fundamental problem ever since the clean water act was created. At some point
we must show some restraint and clean up our act. This raises the question is this a need or luxury because you could justify build these houses
on wetlands simple to provide housing for your fellow man. In according to the levels of embeddness, and land ethics it’s okay to use the land to
fulfill a need for us or others. Or is it just a luxury an to make money in exchange bartering the land off like it’s a good/service. The earth is one big
level organism that provides us the means to survive by destroy habitats we destroy multiple food chains. These food chains both grow plants and
house animals that are an important part of our lifestyles. To say that animals and habitats don’t have value because it is hear just to provide. We
even think we can build structure like a dam to redirect nature and grow new life, but that has fail on several occasions to sustain life for aquatic
life (i.e. salmon). When do we exercise some disproportionality respect the land as much as we do our fellow man.
Boylan, E. M. (2014). Environmental Ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publisher
On the surface, the destruction of a habitat may seem victimless if we take the view that living things that feel no pain should not be considered
when discussing moral implications. What harm could come from bulldozing trees, rocks, soil, and other objects with no sense of self,
consciousness, or feelings? Evidently, the harm can be tremendous. Within the habitat are hundreds or thousands of animals that do feel pain and
will suffer from the loss of their habitat. Although we are not causing direct physical harm to any such animals while clearing land, they are
indirectly impacted by these actions. Peter Singer supposes that although animals, such as pigs, horses, etc. have different levels of needs and
interests than humans, it is morally right to consider the quality of their lives when making decisions since they can suffer as humans do (Boylan,
2014, 280). Clearing land for the use of human activities takes away an animal’s home and food supply. I would definitely equate lacking adequate
living space and food a form of suffering. If the suffering of these animals is found to be more profound than the positive outcomes of
demolishing habitats, it would be unethical to proceed.
From an anthropocentric point of view, destroying habitats also indirectly impact humans. The loss of biodiversity in plants and animals due to
stripping the land and a reduction of trees (natural CO₂ sponges) will ultimately make life harder for the human species. Another way human
beings can be impacted is by erosion. By removing vegetation, the ground can become unstable and erode away, creating landslide hazards
(Tarbuck, Lutgens, & Tasa, 2014). For these reasons, it is a moral obligation for human beings to ensure a balance of clearing land and preserving
it; if the majority would suffer, then the minority in favor of destroying habitats should not do so.
Boylan, M. (Ed.). (2014). Environmental ethics (2nd ed.). (pp. 280). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son, Inc.
Tarbuck, E., Lutgens, F., & Tasa, D. (2014). Earth: an introduction to physical geology (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
All Animals Are Equal Discussion Paper
Excellent The essay demonstrates exemplary comprehension of the relevant content by thoroughly as well as correctly discussing the relevant information; identifying as well as explaining all of the 3 fundamental aspects; using correct terminology; describing the reasoning next to key points/claims; as well as substantiating points with several accurate as well as illuminating examples, as necessary or useful. There are no gaps in the necessary answer. Good Scholarly sources that are credible are employed to successfully support statements that are, as the most part, clear as well as fairly expressed. With just a few minor inaccuracies, APA 6th Edition is utilized. There are a few small typos in the references and/or citations. There is some reliance on dubious sources. Satisfactory Because of certain improper terminology and/or confusing wording, the work is frequently confused and difficult to understand; thoughts may be disjointed, meandering, and/or repetitious. a lack of structure; and/or grammatical, spelling, and punctuation mistakes. Poor The essay demonstrates a lack of understanding of the related documents by failing to address or improperly addressing the relevant; failing to identify or incorrectly trying to explain key concepts/ideas; ignoring as well as incorrectly attempting to explain key points/claims as well as the rationale behind them; and/or inaccurately or improperly using terminology. No Response Essay displays great writing abilities, such as a clear as well as thought-provoking thesis, suitable and effective organization, vibrant and persuasive supporting materials, good diction as well as sentence skills, and faultless or almost perfect mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. The essay flawlessly achieves the assignment’s objectives. Quality of Response Because of its intelligent growth and mature manner, this study merits attention. It provides a compelling analysis of or reaction to the text, expanding on that response using well-chosen examples and arguments. The sixth paper demonstrates that its author can typically use appropriate words, employ advanced phrases successfully, and adhere to written English rules. Delivery Timeline 3 hours – 24 hours Backlinks www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.contentexpertagencies.com/orders/ordernow
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.