Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

 Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

Table of Contents

Order ID	53003233773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

The “self” has an essential function in dialogue. Without skillful management of ourselves, we are at the mercy of our unconscious operating systems.

To upgrade our operating systems from “thought- or memory-based” to be more creative and “awareness-based,” as both dialogue theorist W. B. Pearce is suggesting, we need to learn how to make this change at the moment. While the change is simple in nature, it can be challenging in practice.

For the first assignment, the idea is to shift from assumptions to mindfulness and awareness of our communication with others.

To make this shift from unconscious conversation into conscious dialogue, Assignment 1 is to identify a topic where a strong belief is held.

Assignment Instructions

Part 1: Choose a subject that is meaningful to you and has opposing viewpoints.

For this assignment, you will have a conversation with a colleague or friend where the other person has a different view than you.

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

Some examples: school choice/charter schools, eating meat or refraining from eating meat, vaccinating infants or avoiding vaccination, requiring identification to vote in state and federal elections, restricting junk food and soda in food deserts or at schools, or guidelines against children under age 10 having smartphones. Additional examples can be found by visiting the Claremont Lincoln University Virtual Library and searching “Opposing Viewpoints” under Gale in the A-Z Database.

Part 2: Go into the conversation with a strong commitment to understanding the other side of the issue; this will mean shifting from advocacy to inquiry as well as using active listening skills. With inquiry, you are now going to reflect more deeply on the other position. What elements of the opposing viewpoint may be correct?

What were you not open to that you are now considering?

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

What shifts are possible when you employ mindfulness and seek out an understanding of the opposing viewpoint?

Part 3: After your advocacy and inquiry conversation, reflect on what you learned about yourself and on active listening.

For this assignment, you will create a 5-10 slide presentation (PowerPoint or similar). Document your experience in the conversation and detail your shift from advocacy to an inquiry.

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

Include in Assignment 1:

Opening information to introduce the issue and captivating the interest of the viewer by explaining why this topic is essential.

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

A brief explanation of the initial conversation when you were advocating your point of view.

A brief explanation of your thought process when you shifted to an inquiry.

Address these questions:

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

What changed for you when you moved from advocacy to inquiry?

How did the person you were speaking to respond to your active listening?

What aspects of your beliefs, assumptions, and opinions about the subject were challenged?

Where did you become more aware of how your beliefs were preventing you from seeing the opposing viewpoint?

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

Where were you closed to new ideas, and how did this exercise allow you to employ mindful techniques?

What insights did you discover, and how do you see this as being necessary to the purposes of dialogue?

Use best practices for a slide presentation (don’t overfill your slides with text, use visuals, create uncluttered slides that are easy for the viewer to navigate, and think carefully about how each slide contributes to your overall idea).

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

Information on the American Psychological Association (APA) style guide can be found in the APA style guide located in the CLU library or on the APA Style website. Additional tools are available through the student resources module. 

Advocacy and Inquiry Conversation on Operating Systems

Excellent	The essay demonstrates exemplary comprehension of the relevant content by thoroughly as well as correctly discussing the relevant information; identifying as well as explaining all of the 3 fundamental aspects; using correct terminology; describing the reasoning next to key points/claims; as well as substantiating points with several accurate as well as illuminating examples, as necessary or useful. There are no gaps in the necessary answer.
Good	Scholarly sources that are credible are employed to successfully support statements that are, as the most part, clear as well as fairly expressed. With just a few minor inaccuracies, APA 6th Edition is utilized. There are a few small typos in the references and/or citations. There is some reliance on dubious sources.
Satisfactory	Because of certain improper terminology and/or confusing wording, the work is frequently confused and difficult to understand; thoughts may be disjointed, meandering, and/or repetitious. a lack of structure; and/or grammatical, spelling, and punctuation mistakes.
Poor	The essay demonstrates a lack of understanding of the related documents by failing to address or improperly addressing the relevant; failing to identify or incorrectly trying to explain key concepts/ideas; ignoring as well as incorrectly attempting to explain key points/claims as well as the rationale behind them; and/or inaccurately or improperly using terminology.
No Response	Essay displays great writing abilities, such as a clear as well as thought-provoking thesis, suitable and effective organization, vibrant and persuasive supporting materials, good diction as well as sentence skills, and faultless or almost perfect mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. The essay flawlessly achieves the assignment’s objectives.
Quality of Response	Because of its intelligent growth and mature manner, this study merits attention. It provides a compelling analysis of or reaction to the text, expanding on that response using well-chosen examples and arguments. The sixth paper demonstrates that its author can typically use appropriate words, employ advanced phrases successfully, and adhere to written English rules.
Delivery Timeline	3 hours – 24 hours
Backlinks	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.contentexpertagencies.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.